By Max Musson:
On a nationalist discussion
forum recently, one commenter wrote disparagingly of the value of
creating White enclaves. Referring to them as PLEs* he wrote:
“I live in a PLE now, my street as far as I can tell, is devoid of non-Whites.
“I
suppose I could just switch off from reality and pretend to myself that
this is how the rest of Britain is. Comfort myself that every street is
like mine.
“We can take turns to have little get-together’s and help each other out with maintenance and gardening.
“But what if a neighbour moves out and a non-White moves in?
“What
if while I’m being jolly walking up and down my street exchanging
hello’s with my White neighbours the rest of the city has turned into a
third world ghetto?
“How
will I stop my beautiful street from being consumed like all the rest
when I live in a small bubble and have cut myself totally off from
reality and political influence?”
This individual made the
common mistake of assuming that any all White area constitutes a PLE*
or White enclave as we prefer to call it, but that is not the case.
An entirely White street
does not constitute a White enclave, it is merely a street that remains
White by default, because no non-Whites have as yet chosen to live
there. It is ‘passively’ White, rather than ‘actively’ or
‘intentionally’ White as an enclave must be if it is to serve its
purpose.
A White enclave is created
only when the White population of a locality decide as a group to take
active measures to ensure that their community remains wholly White. A
White enclave is a community that remains White, not by default but
through their sustained force of will.
Suppose a nationalist lives
as the commenter above does, in an entirely White street composed of
say, thirty households, and he has two friends who are also
nationalists, and who live further up the street. Such a person could do
as the very negative commenter suggests and just sit back and passively
watch as gradually his White neighbours grow old and die or move house,
leaving houses vacant for non-Whites to buy and occupy, or he could
take positive steps to secure the future of the neighbourhood in which
he lives by creating a consciously White enclave composed of militant
White families who wish to remain wholly White and who also wish to keep
their area wholly White, and this is how it can be done.
Firstly in any street of
this kind there will essentially be four types of people; those who like
our nationalist are desirous of keeping the street White and are
prepared to take steps to actively make this happen; those who would
like the street to remain White but are not prepared to act upon this
desire; those who are neutral and don’t care either way; and those who
would like to encourage non-White settlement in the street. The first
step is to identify which of the street’s residents fall into which
category and this can be done either directly or indirectly, by either
contriving to engage them individually in conversation and raising the
matter obliquely, or by going down the street with a questionnaire and
asking each resident directly.
Either method will suffice
and both methods will eventually make your neighbours aware of where you
stand on the issue, as they are bound to talk among themselves to some
degree or another.
Having identified the
people who are prepared to take action, the next step is to meet with
them and to sell the idea of forming a co-operative for the express
purpose of creating a White enclave. This group may initially be small
and may consist of only five of the thirty households to begin with, but
five households working in concert would be enough initially to begin
to effect change.
The next step is to call
upon the resources of similarly minded people in the wider neighbourhood
and beyond, and even as far away as neighbouring towns, who would be
prepared to assist your project and who would ultimately like to support
your project by moving into your street.
There will also be some
people who will wish to support your idea, albeit that they are not in a
position to participate by moving into the enclave themselves. It is a
never-ending source of surprise to me just how selflessly altruistic and
generous many of our people are.
Once these steps have been
followed, with the creation of a bank account for the co-operative,
arrangements should be made for all of the people supporting the idea to
make regular monthly contributions into the fund and money will begin
to accumulate that can be used to buy the houses of those people that
the co-operative do not want to remain in the street.
At this stage I should
emphasise that the co-operative should adopt a formal constitution and
elect officers to administer the assets, initially just money, that the
co-operative raises. We at Western Spring can provide support for any
groups needing assistance in drafting a constitution and needing advice
on the opening of collective bank accounts etc.
It is quite feasible that a
co-operative might quite quickly attract support from as many as thirty
individual households in and around their neighbourhood and with each
household contributing say £50/m each, the co-operative would accumulate
money at the rate of £1,500/m or £18,000 per annum.
Each member of the
co-operative should also canvass support from amongst their parents as
our nationalists will most likely have spouses or partners and have
children and the grandparents from both sides of each family will almost
certainly have an emotional interest in the future wellbeing of their
grandchildren and may be prepared to contribute also. In this way,
thirty contributing households could quickly expand to ninety, and scope
therefore exists for such an enclave to build capital at a rate of over
£50,000 per annum and in a northern town where terraced houses can
often sell for as little as £30,000, it will only take about a year
before such a co-operative is in a position to raise buy-to-let
mortgages on perhaps as many as five houses.
The
members of the co-operative should also form an auxiliary organization
to run alongside the co-operative, and it should be styled as a
‘residents association’ and one that they will obviously dominate due to
their numbers and due to the fact that they will vote as a bloc in any
residents’ association meetings. If there is a pre-existing residents
association, then the members of the co-operative should join it and
take it over by voting as a bloc.
Under the guise of the
residents’ association, the co-operative will then be able to take
actions and make representations to the authorities without any need to
disclose their underlying agenda, and may be able to obtain local
authority funding for community events and for the redevelopment of any
existing vacant or derelict buildings in the area.
The residents’ association
will also be a useful vehicle through which to make representations to
the local authority regarding any planning issues in the area and many
of the initially less racially minded of the street’s residents can be
drawn unwittingly into helping with the arrangement of community events
and fund raising events that will obviously benefit the residents’
association, but which may also be arranged in such a way that they also
indirectly benefit the co-operative.
The residents’ association
will also be helpful in liaising with the police and the establishment
of a neighbourhood watch, and it is obviously important that the
co-operative control the neighbourhood watch, so that they are in
control of any information that gets reported, vis-à-vis antisocial
behaviour.
In any community there will
be some antisocial elements and it should not be necessary for me to
explain in too great a detail, that some ‘antisocial’ behaviour can turn
out in the long run to be of benefit to the community, especially if it
deters more significant and ultimately more damaging, antisocial
behaviour on the part of certain individuals who are determined not to
be, shall we say, ‘neighbourly’.
This brings us to
the acquisition of houses and the first houses to be targeted should be
those occupied by the residents who are inclined to welcome non-White
settlement in the street. These residents should be approached
individually once sufficient funds have been accumulated and funding has
been arranged for the co-operative to acquire their houses on a
buy-to-let basis. Most people of a liberal/leftist predisposition will
not be overly keen to continue living in a street that is dominated by a
group of residents who are militantly racialist and this state of
affairs can be subtly and not so subtly conveyed to the unwanted
multiracialist residents as circumstances require.
Provided with a little
encouragement and offered a fair price for their house and therefore
able to move immediately and without paying estate agents fees, all but
the most obstinate of the unwanted will eventually accept and sell to
the co-operative, where-upon the co-operative will acquire the house and
immediately let it to one of the deserving families that are members
and supporters of the co-operative, but who have hitherto lived outside
the area.
Once all of the residents
who might welcome non-White settlement have gone, the danger of
non-Whites moving into the street will have receded significantly and
the co-operative can begin winning the active support of or replacing
the people who are neutral or passive with regard to the project.
It may be that during the
course of any year as many as five houses will come up for sale
initially owned by people who are not committed to the co-operative, and
should that happen, as I have already explained, it should be possible
for the co-operative to purchase these and move nationalist tenants into
the street, thereby creating a situation in which the entire street
will be owned and or controlled by the co-operative or it’s committed
members within five to six years.
Once most of a street has
been secured, the co-operative can canvass the next street, and so on.
Furthermore the co-operative should extend the scope of its activity,
making the enclave an ‘enterprise zone’; helping one family to convert
their home into a general store; helping another to set up a car repair
business in a garage block if one exists; and helping any other members
who are in any way entrepreneurial to build small businesses that will
provide a reliable income for them and employment for others.
Naturally, all of the
members of the co-operative should give their custom to their own people
wherever possible, so that the businesses grow, and as I say, employ
more people and can benefit from economies of scale and thereby provide
goods and services at lower prices.
Any co-operative member who
has a teaching background can be assisted to set up a home schooling
support group so that parents within the co-operative do not have to
expose their children to state brainwashing. If the group becomes large
enough, the co-operative can investigate the possibility of setting up a
private faith school (open to practicing Cosmotheist children only),
and such a venture, under the right conditions and presented in the
right way, might even attract some degree of state subsidy.
Eventually, after a number
of years an entire neighbourhood, or an entire village could become
dominated by the co-operative and a sizeable, militant White community
will have been established.
Naturally, if an
organization invests all of its time and effort in producing just one
such enclave over that kind of period, the single
street/village/neighbourhood enclave produced will not offer much
succour to our nation, despite constituting a localized White
nationalist stronghold. However, if we are able to stimulate the
establishment of 1,000 such enclaves in various places across the
country, that will represent a significant national resource, sufficient
to secure the physical survival of our people and provide the basis for
a revival of our nation. Furthermore, in any five year period that
would follow, disproportionately greater progress would undoubtedly be
made.
In time, as enclaves expand
in size, their populations will become sufficient to ensure that White
nationalists are initially elected to parish councils, then borough and
county councils in the wards covered by the enclaves. Furthermore
neighbouring enclaves will ultimately coalesce as they expand and create
the prospect of us getting members of parliament elected. In the
fullness of time, even if an organization had no other power winning
strategy to complement their programme of enclave development, control
of enough of our country could be secured, sufficient for us to achieve
sovereign political power and self-determination either for part or the
whole of the UK.
Naturally, no matter how
carefully we proceed with such a project, a point will be reached when
our racial enemies will realise what we are doing and where our enclaves
are and this will present us with a number of security issues that will
need to be dealt with at that time. Such a state of affairs has however
been faced by our ancestors many times in the past, when a neighbouring
enemy people have treated our presence with hostility, and like them we
will have to face up to the dangers presented and overcome them. Such
is life!
The thought we must keep
fresh in our minds however is that anything is possible once we decide
to embark upon a course of action with energy and determination and we
at Western Spring have dedicated our lives to the task of bringing
salvation to our people.
A revolution is coming … please join us!
By Max Musson © 2014
max.musson@hotmail.co.uk*PLE – ‘Pioneer Little Europe’
0 comMENTS:
Post a comment