Sunday, 7 October 2012

Abuse of White trust (The enemy within)

Abuse of white trust (The enemy within)

As many people know I have done a fair bit of traveling in my life, up until now, and one of the things that traveling brings is the opportunity to observe a wide range of people.

When I have visited different nations and continents, as I have observed these people, I have often noticed that the various nations of the world have differing standards of behavior, and moral codes, that which is right for one race, is wrong for another, and what is offensive to one ethnic group may be accepted, or even celebrated by a different group.

Amongst the things that have stood out is that the White race, in my experience, has tended to be a generous, trusting and hospitable race.

Let me give you an example of this, after the tsunami of a couple of years ago, the most charitable donations came from white western nations, despite the fact that this natural disaster occurred in a non-white region.

I'm sure that those who seek to hoist white guilt upon us, instead of thanking the west would just turn around and say "So what? The west is richer" The trouble with this sort of hostile, and ungrateful way of looking at things is that it fails to look at the wider picture, and the simple, but unarguable fact that some eastern European nations, whose economies have been ravaged by the abuses of their jewish inspired communist histories, have been more generous than some more fiscally able, non-white nations, rich with oil money, or who have been subsidized by the west (more white charity).

I've visited lots of European nations, and another thing I have discovered is that I have often found myself being made welcome by complete strangers, something that is not always evident in certain other non-European nations.

Of course this complete openness, and trust, will not come as a surprise to most of the people here, after all if we extend the picture from individuals, to nations, we can see that the European and American nations have, by and large, been very welcoming to people of different races and ethnic groups, far more so than any non-white nations.

Unfortunately for us this virtue has been repeatedly exploited by the jewish supremacists, to leave us with virtual open border policies, that have poisoned our countries, and caused our crime rates to spiral out of control (although still well below the rates of most non-white countries).

I'm sure this is obvious to most people, and yet, when we venture into the Nationalist communities, we see the very self same errors being repeated, within our own ranks.

In some modern Nationalist circles it is becoming increasingly the vogue to welcome, with open arms, those who speak out against the jewish question. Now to me this sets off many alarm bells.

Let us think about this for a second.

A recent book by a senior CIA analyst who headed the agency’s task force on Osama bin Laden sharply attacks the Bush administration’s approach to Islamic terrorists, sternly criticizes the decision to invade Iraq, and chides officials for trying to create a Western-style democracy in Afghanistan.

Senior US leaders, the book argues, mistakenly urge Americans to believe that the Islamic world is offended by the nation’s philosophical emphasis on personal rights and liberties and “that Muslims hate and attack us for what we are and think, rather than for what we do.”

The author calls the Iraq war “an avaricious, premeditated, unprovoked war.

The author, who writes under the name Anonymous, argues that it is not dislike of freedom, democracy, and Western culture that led bin Laden to wage war against America, but rather his disdain for US policies and actions in the Muslim world, particularly America’s relationship with Israel.

This is not a Nationalist speaking, this is a senior CIA analyst.

How about some of the recent comments by former President Jimmy Carter, about the Israeli regime?

There is no way that Jimmy Carter could ever be defined as a Nationalist, but as with our senior CIA analyst, and the rank and file of Nationalists, he can see a jewish problem.

Let's go even further, let us move away from high profile names, and into the general population.

A poll commissioned by the Council for the National Interest Foundation, back in October of last year, showed that a significant number of Americans are wary of the power of the Israel lobby, and believe it is behind the invasion of Iraq and the current belligerent tone of the White House and Congress toward Iran.

The poll revealed that 39% of the American public “agree” or “somewhat agree” that “the work of the Israel lobby on Congress and the Bush administration has been a key factor for going to war in Iraq and now confronting Iran.”

This is one issue, and on this issue almost 40% of the American public agree, to one degree or another, that the Israeli lobby has been a key factor, and I stress the word key here, this does not include the number that see it as a less significant factor, or a factor in other issues.

We are not just talking about former Presidents here, we are not just talking high powered, and knowledgeable senior CIA analyst, we are saying that at least some degree of knowledge of the problem has now permeated it's way into the mainstream.

Now I ask you this, if at least 40% of the mainstream can quite rightly identify that the Israeli lobby, and the Jewish supremacists had a guiding hand in the attack on Iraq, and other issues, are we to truly believe that a supposed Nationalist can not?

If the "lemmings" can see this much, then what are those that are below this level, who are these "sub-lemmings", and why should someone so blind to the obvious, want to integrate himself within our communities, and then to speak out, supposedly in an intellectual manner, against our most prominent issue, and to deflect us from the path that we know to be right and to be justified?

Sadly, because of our trusting, and hospitable nature, or even more sadly, in some cases, because of pure greed, there are those that will hold the door open for these "sub-lemmings", and let them into our midst, to wreak havoc and destruction, whether through ignorance of the jewish question, or for deliberate malign intentions.

These "door holders" argue that we have to do this because we are all fighting for the same goal, but I can tell you right now, my goal is not to confuse the population, or to divide Nationalism, so my goal is not the same as those that enter our ranks to disrupt, nor is it the same as a "door holder".

Other "door holders" argue that if we mention the jewish question it scares people away, but as I have just shown there is a large percentage of the population who are not as stupid as the "door holders" insultingly think they are, and I ask you anyway, is that the way to recruit, by treating our recruits as idiots, and by lying to them?

I believe that if the 1 or 2% of us who have fully grasped the message can wake up 40% then why should we not be able to wake up a further 10%, 20% or even 30% to make us a majority, and in a position to effect change?

There is absolutely no justification for being a "door holder"!

There is no doubt, in the mind of any true Nationalist, that the most overwhelming problem, facing all people of White European descent today, is the problem of Zionism, and Jewish Supremacism.

It is to the credit of the White race that we are open, honest, trusting and welcoming, but we must not let others use this to their advantage, and to our detriment.


Post a Comment


Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More