Tuesday, 26 June 2012

Jewish Scientist Seeks Physical Cure For ‘White Racism.’

Time is running out for a white race already brainwashed into accepting, even welcoming their own fate.
‘Racism’ will be cured by future proceedures such as nano-tech operations to lobotomise areas of the brain as well as to alter DNA to ‘breed out’ the ability to discriminate within the white brain:
“Racism is ‘hardwired’ into the human brain – and people (Ed: in the terms of political correctness this means whites) can be prejudiced without knowing it.” Says Jewish (anti-white studies) scientinst Dr Elizabeth Phelps, of New York University.
But what is a big discovery for Talmudic thinkers has long been well known to all the rest of us. ‘Racism’ is hardwired into the brain and it operates unconsciously. “The same circuits in the brain that allow us to see which ethnic group a person belongs to overlap with others that drive emotional decisions.” And her anti-nature conclusion is: “The result is that even right-thinking individuals make unconscious decisions based on a person’s race.”
Of course the Satanic Jews do not believe in nature i.e. Gods creation, but in nurture; mans tinkering with nature, human and animal in order to re-shape everything to suit THEIR needs as believers that all non-Jews are cattle and that the god of the Jews Satan or Yahweh has clearly promised in the Talmud that all non-Jews will be their slaves and that all their wealth and property will go to the ‘chosen people.’ Therefore Jews seek a physical way in which they can stop all criticism or antipathy towards them as they rejig the human race to suit their ends.
Aryans have long known that so-called ‘racism’ is an operational necessity for tribes, races, nations and animal species to protect themselves from intrusion from outside. Antipathy to other groups as a whole is natural and important to preserve human and animal bio-diversity. A bio-diversity the Jews want to end by creating an entirely new world with living meat grown in laborotories and the Goyim microchipped, lobotomised and enhanced with technology to help them carry out slave functions successfuly and be under entire Jewish control.
In a sentence which betrays the plan to alter the human genome and the brain of individuals Dr Phelps says that “The finding may force researchers to think about racism in entirely new ways, and the findings published in Nature Neuroscience could lead to fresh ways of thinking about unintended race-based attitudes and decisions.” Dr Elizabeth Phelps, of New York University, and colleagues reviewed previous brain scanning studies showing how social categories of race are processed, evaluated and incorporated in decision-making.
Worryingly for the future of the white race in the face of Jewish genocide-science, the research showed a network of brain regions called the the amygdala, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex are important in the unintentional, implicit expression of racial attitudes. Knowing where these structures exist gives these scientists, all of whom live on huge grants paid for by white tax-payers, the opportunity to bring the goal of ending the white race closer.
Phelps’s researchers said the brain areas themselves – as well as the functional connectivity among them – are critical for this processing. Dr Phelps said: “A few decades ago, it was unthinkable that looking at the brain to understand representations of social groups such as black versus white was even posssible let alone that such explorations could yield useful knowledge. Evidence from neuroscience has been vital in clarifying the nature of how intergroup cognition unfolds.”
“Moreover, the neuroscience of race has been useful in pointing the way toward the type of new behavioural evidence needed to answer questions of not only what happens when intergroup cognition is at stake, but whether and how change is possible in real human interactions. How to use this knowledge from brain and behaviour to further extend basic knowledge and to drive applications is the obvious next generation of questions that we must pose.”

Phelps concluded “If good people who intend well act in a manner inconsistent with their own standards of egalitarianism because of the racial groups to which ‘the other’ belongs, then the question of change takes on new and urgent meaning. This urgency requires that we attend to the evidence about how our minds work when we confront racial and other group differences. Thus far, we have obtained modest evidence about these processes as they operate in our brains, unbeknownst to our conscious selves. The question of what we will do with these insights awaits an answer.”



Post a Comment


Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More