Saturday, 7 January 2012



PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY IS A FRAUD: a confidence trick. It is not government genuinely representative of the people and expressive of their will.
One fact suffices to prove this, although there is other proof galore.

The great majority of the British people never wanted the Coloured Invasion of their homeland, but it has been imposed on them nevertheless, and laws brought in to compel acceptance of alien occupation and control. What this dishonest system does do is to present a deceiving facade of public consideration, deference and accountability, while effectively rigging the situation for the permanent dominance of its beneficiaries by shaping the public mind to its purposes by media indoctrination and by denying facilities to those other than its proprietorial parties and approved elements who are representative of a virtual dictatorship by the real ruling forces in the background.

THE OLD PARTIES are but variations, bogus alternatives, within the same system. They put on an act of combat, but really they are a consensus committed to the course of Britain's decline and downfall. All of them support the Coloured Invasion and the enforcement of multiracialism, and alien influence on our affairs from both within and without. The system sets up from time to time, when it seems advantageous, bogus options such as currently the Referendum Party of the billionaire financier, the Jew Sir James Goldsmith, to side-track and dissipate discontent.

This fake puts on an act of standing for British sovereignty against foreign regulation from Brussels, but has nothing to say about and against foreign, including Jewish, influence in London conceived by him and his followers as compatible with British sovereignty.

TONY BLAIR and his freshly packaged Labour Party is reckoned most likely to win the 1997 General Election. He is hugely Jewish financed. £500,000 has just been given to him by leading Jewish business men including Sir Trevor Chinn, Britain's biggest motor dealer (Lex Service); Alex Bernstein, former Granada TV chairman; Bob Gavron, publishing millionaire who himself recently gave £500,000 to the party; Sir Emmanuel Kaye, chairman of Lansing Bagnall; and Michael Levy, head of N & G Records.

WHAT OF THOSE OUTSIDE THE OLD PARTIES, namely those who accept all of this condemnation of the system and its operators, but who think that the thing to do is to seek to change things by getting a new party elected to power?

These well intentioned people fail to realise that they are doomed to failure by the foreseeable reaction of the power-holders. These may allow them to expend time and money in electioneering so long as they get nowhere near seriously challenging their position, but the moment the new party becomes a real challenge - an almost inconceivable achievement considering its handicaps - the present power holders will most certainly by one unscrupulous means or another halt that new party and put it out of business. Either its functioning will be rendered impossible by the application of every imaginable impediment, or that new party will be criminated as "racist" and it or its electoral participation prohibited.

THE ONE AND ONLY RIGHT RESPONSE to this system is to say "NO" to it by boycotting the ballot box, not to bolster it by taking part in the next General Election, for electoral participation is to play the party game of our enemies, and so to play into their hands. The one and only way to register your rejection of the whole system which is ruining our race and country is to stay away from the polls and not vote at all.



JEWS from parts of Europe have poured into Britain during the last hundred years or so, crying out that they have been persecuted and appealing for refuge, which has been generously granted to them. Now, however, with the wealth and power which they have amassed, they have taken to demanding and securing more and more legal restraints on criticisng them, meaning more and more reduction in our ancient freedom, so that the wartime poster shown here has new and striking relevance today.

Now, on top of a Public Order Act which penalises not only the distribution of literature critical of them, but also the possession of it, sanctioning the ransacking of homes in this connection, they are seeking and securing the promise of yet further limitations on our freedom.

Heading the concerted attack on our freedom is Eldred Tabachnik, president of the Jewish Board of Deputies, who is a close friend of Tony Blair, leader of the Labour Party. Apart from other measures which can be expected to follow a Labour victory in the forthcoming General Election, whereby Jack Straw of Jewish ancestry will succeed Tory Home Secretary, Michael Howard, identified by the Independent on Sunday (14 April, 1996) as born Michael Hecht, son of a Jewish refugee from Romania; Tabachnik has already succeeded in getting the Labour Party to agree to end freedom of speech on the subject of the depicted Jewish holocaust by subjecting denial of it to a two-year jail sentence.

The Jewish community's main organ, the Jewish Chronicle (4 October, 1996) joyfully reported this forthcoming further mutilation of British freedom as follows:- "A Labour government will act to make Holocaust denial a criminal offence, Opposition leaders pledged this week.

The announcement, made at the party's Blackpool conference, was the culmination of a lengthy campaign by Jewish groups, including the Board of Deputies, the Holocaust Education Trust and Poale Zion. Shadow Home SSecretary Jack Straw confirmed that a motion committing a Labour government to such a law - due to be discussed yesterday - had the backing of the entire leadership. The Blackpool conference continued the party's courting of the Jewish community."

This alleged Jewish holocaust centres on the contention that no less than 6 million Jews were deliberately put to death by Germans during the Second World War, a great part of them by gassing. There are very many substantial and serious contradictions and deficiencies in the accounts, sufficient at least to raise grave doubts that this holocaust ever happened as described, although undoubtedly a great number of Jews were put in camps as avowed enemies of the regime and a security risk to it, and

many fell victim to typhus in the final days of the war when Allied bombing severed communications and stopped supplies.

Instead of the suppression of contrary opinion sought by Tabachnik and his fellow foes of freedom, we call for unhindered free discussion regarding this and all other alleged holocausts and other atrocities. If the Jews are confident of their case, why do they need to ban dissent?

In defence of your status, resist the efforts of Tabachnik and his Jewish foes of freedom to turn you into a Soviet-style thought police under either a Tory or Labour Jewish Home Secretary! Insist on the Force being confined to traditional police work, which today needs all its time and effort to cope with real crime! In keeping with this, when obliged to carry out Public Order Act political searches, refrain from violating the Police & Criminal Evidence Act 1984 by removing material in advance of establishing its relevance!

Colin Jordan


Post a Comment


Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More