14 Words by Email

Catholic priest in 'sham civil partnership' with Muslim to keep him in UK

A high-profile Catholic priest has been suspended after a Mail on Sunday investigation discovered he was in a sham ‘gay marriage’ to help a Pakistani immigrant stay in Britain. Father Donald Minchew – a former Anglican who converted to Catholicism after attacking the Church of England’s loss of traditional values – admitted entering into a civil partnership as a favour to a family friend desperate to work in Britain. .

Remember Dresden

You guys burnt the place down, turned it into a single column of flame. More people died there in the firestorm, in that one big flame, than died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined.” –Kurt Vonnegut, Jr

Texas: Professor discusses building a dream of White genocide.

For over 30 years, Rice University Sociology Professor Dr. Stephen Klineberg has been studying the demographics of Greater Houston, in Texas. Houston’s demographic data reveals that it’s now 33% White, 41% Hispanic (mixed-race), 18% Black, and 8% Asian, and more than 70% of all children are non-White, with the over-60′s being the only age group where White people are still a majority..

This is Europa - Gotland -

On Gotland, you don’t have to travel very far to see the sun rise and watch it sink into the sea on the same day. The sea is always close by

French Jew Brutally Assaulted by Muslims in Paris

A Jewish teacher was savagely beaten by a group of Arab men in a brutal anti-Semitic attack in Paris, according to the Bureau for National Vigilance Against Anti-Semitism (BNVCA). The attackers - who shouted "death to the Jews" and "filthy Jew" during the assault - broke the victim's nose and drew a swastika on his chest after tearing open his shirt.

Wednesday, 16 April 2014

Illegal immigrant murdered a British teenager but we can't deport him because he is GAY (although he kept it quiet until he was about to be packed off)

An illegal immigrant who murdered a British teenager less than a year after he arrived in Britain cannot be deported because he is gay, a top judge has ruled.
The 29-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has been released from jail and is now free to roam the streets after Lord Justice Maurice Kay said that sending him back to Jamaica would violate his human rights as a homosexual.
The judge referred to Article Three in the Human Rights Act, which protects an individual from inhuman or degrading treatment.
The murderer, referred to only as JR, arrived in the UK in December 2000 when he was 15, and, with another person, was 'party to the murder of another teenage boy' less than a year later in 2001, the judge said.

He and his co-defendant were convicted of murder and sentenced to detention at Her Majesty's pleasure in September 2002, before being freed from prison in June 2012.
Ever since he was released, Theresa May, the Home Secretary, has been battling to have him sent home.

JR successfully appealed her decision to deport him to the First-Tier Tribunal (FTT), and won again at the Upper Tribunal when Mrs May challenged that decision last year.

Now, Lord Justice Kay, sitting with Lord Justice Lewison and Sir Stanley Burnton at the Court of Appeal in London, has blocked the Government's final attempt to have JR deported.

The judge said JR spent 11 and a half years in custody before declaring himself gay in April 2012.

The First-Tier Tribunal accepted he was homosexual, and that he would be at risk of 'inhuman or degrading treatment' if returned to Jamaica.The Upper Tribunal later refused Mrs May's appeal, after hearing JR's mother give evidence that she 'knew all along' that her son was gay.

His 'late disclosure' of his sexuality was said to have been 'prompted by societal attitudes, particularly that of Jamaicans towards gays'.

At the Court of Appeal, Catherine Rowlands, for Mrs May, argued that the offender's eleventh hour assertion of homosexuality should have been rejected 'on credibility grounds', as 'he had made no mention of it' during a previous asylum application.
Human rights: The Jamaican, known only as JR, has been allowed to stay in Britain by the Court of Appeal
Human rights: The Jamaican, known only as JR, has been allowed to stay in Britain by the Court of Appeal

The barrister argued that 'the claim of homosexuality was contrived and brought as a last resort to avoid deportation.'
But Lord Justice Kay dismissed the appeal, saying the FTT had obviously found JR's mother 'an impressive witness'.

He added: 'I consider that the Upper Tribunal was correct to find no error of law in the FTT's treatment of the issue of homosexuality'.

Mrs May accepted that, if the man was genuinely gay, he could not be deported, and the Upper Tribunal had also found that he 'no longer constitutes a significant danger to the community of the UK.'
The judge went on: 'It follows from what I have said that the Secretary of State's appeal must fail.'
But in a warning to any offenders hoping to avoid deportation by pretending to be gay, he added: 'I should add, however, that this case turns on its specific and quite unusual facts. It should not be seen as providing more general succour to others convicted of grave crimes.'

OTHER CRIMINALS WE CAN'T GET RID OF BECAUSE OF 'HUMAN RIGHTS'

Last month Mafia don Domenico Rancadore escaped deportation to his native Italy after a British judge ruled that the cramped Italian jails would breach his human rights.
The 65-year-old who fled arrest in Italy 20 years ago and came to Britain, where he has lived ever since, was sentenced to seven years in prison in his home country for running a branch of the Mafia involved in drug trafficking, extortion and racketeering.
In December 2013 a Somali criminal with a history of violence was allowed to walk free after a High Court judge ruled that detaining him any longer would breach his human rights.
Abdi Ismail, 33, was convicted of a string of crimes since arriving in Britain in 1993, including racially aggravated threatening behaviour and assault on police.
In 2011, he was sentenced to a 15-month jail term for assault and told he would be deported after attacking a friend with a knife, but a judge let him walk free after deciding he had been detained for too long.
Last year, a vicious Somali rapist who was jailed for ten years after threatening to kill his pregnant victim as he raped her was allowed to stay in Britain because he has other family members here.
Mustafa Abdullahi, 31, came to Britain aged 11 and immigration judges ruled he had been in the UK so long that deportation would deprive him of the right to a family life.

source

Monday, 14 April 2014

Canada: Nine Months in Jail for Blasphemy Against Islam

Caution: If you happen to be in Canada, and you say something in public that hurts the feelings of Muslims, you may well be sentenced to nine months in jail.
That’s what happened to Eric Brazau in Toronto. Mind you, I’ve seen a video of Mr. Brazau’s street-corner theatrics, and he also wore offensive attire, made insulting facial expressions, and laughed derisively at or in the general direction of Muslims. So he was lucky to get off so lightly. In the face of such heinous crimes, the judge was lenient — he/she/it could have thrown the book at Eric Brazau.
Many thanks to Vlad Tepes for uploading and transcribing this discussion on Ezra Levant’s TV program:
Transcript:


00:08 If you commit the crime of sexual assault in Canada,
00:12 are tried, convicted and sentenced, your average time in jail will be about…
00:16 two months. But if you hand out fliers that are mean
00:20 to the ‘religion’, the set of ideas called ‘Islam’, well, you
00:24 will serve nine months in jail. That’s not just a theory, that’s a fact.
00:29 That’s what Eric Brazau served as a result of a recent sentence, and joining me now
00:33 in studio to talk about this is Chris Schafer, Straight Talk contributor, and legal expert.
00:37 Chris its great to see you again. It’s the first time we have had you on the show in your new capacity
00:41 as a SUN News Network Legal Beagle. In the past you were with the Canadian Constitution Foundation,
00:45 but any way you slice it, you’re for freedom. (CS) I am for freedom Ezra, and happy to be here.
00:49 Well, one of the freedoms I hold dear is the freedom of speech. I believe it is the freedom upon which all others are based,
00:53 and in fact if you take away my other freedoms, keep me my free speech, and I’ll use it to fight
00:57 for those other freedoms. In this case, Eric Brazau,
01:01 well, you read the full case and I’d like you to tell our viewers the facts. What
01:05 did Eric Brazau do, to get himself charged, not with the Human Rights Commissions,
01:09 but with a police criminal charge? Give us the facts.
01:13 (CS) Basically, he stood in a street corner and was a little bit over the top,
01:17 outrageous some would say, dressed up in theatrical
01:21 outfits and handing out pamphlets and having protest signs against
01:25 Islam. And basically had a little show and tell on the street corner
01:29 (EL) Was that here in Toronto? (CS)Correct. (EL) Well, I see that all the time I go by Dundas Square,
01:33 they are giving out Korans. I mean, actually, most of the street theater there is the Korans being handed out.
01:37 (CS) Go by the consulate, Israeli consulate in Toronto almost any day
01:41 and there’s self hating Jews there protesting outside and
01:45 other groups, Muslim religion protesting, they’re never arrested, charged.
01:49 I’ve hung out at out occupy Toronto, I’ve been to Line 9 protests, I mean, their specialty is
01:53 theatrical words designed to generate hate. So this guy was dressed up,
01:57 and he was handing out these pamphlets, and he was just sort of — was he ranting or…
02:01 was he just talking? What was he doing? (CS) He was protesting, he was ranting, he was
02:05 acting out aspects that he believed…
02:09 (EL) He didn’t touch anyone? (CS) To my knowledge there was no violence, the guy,
02:13 if you read the court decision, was a — came off as quite
02:17 pleasant in some respects, but… (EL) So, but he was charged with
02:22 the criminal code provision of spreading hatred. (CS) Correct (EL) Hatred is a human emotion.
02:26 I mean, you can’t just remove that from your heart, any more than you can
02:30 say, ‘you are now in love with him’. (CS) You stick ten judges in a room, Ezra…
02:34 and you’ll get ten different opinions of whether this material constituted
02:38 hate, and we saw that in a supreme court decision recently, in the Whatcott supreme court decision,
02:42 looked at criticism of homosexuality in Saskatchewan. Different judges at different appeal courts reach
02:46 different conclusions of whether that material constituted hate.
02:50 I’m willing to bet the same thing here. (EL) Some people hate the Toronto Maple Leafs,
02:54 they love this sports team. Some people hate this political party and love that political party.
02:58 Some people hate an ex-girlfriend. Some people hate Vladimir
03:02 Putin. I mean, why aren’t I allowed to have the human emotion
03:06 called hate? And if you tell me I’m not allowed to feel that,
03:10 is that going to change my mind? I draw the line as when you do something
03:14 criminal with that hate, like punch someone in the nose. But merely having a hurt feeling…
03:18 or hateful feeling, how can you criminalize that, Chris? (CS) Well we have.
03:22 There’s criminal code provisions for that, you know yourself, you know very well…
03:26 the human rights provisions that can drag you before human rights tribunals.
03:30 (EL) Nine months in jail, this guy before his hearings. So you know, he served
03:34 nine months for no violence, no threats…
03:38 (CS) No threats to my knowledge; it was criminal harassment.
03:42 (EL) Lemme… Lemme — as in he was taking, he took a picture of some people in a burka or something. (CS) Correct.
03:46 (EL) I thought that was allowed to take pictures of people in a public place.
03:50 I guess not if you are the wrong species… I mean, imagine if this rule was applied to
03:54 anti-Christian advocates. Or atheist advocates.
03:58 Let’s quote from the ruling, I want to get the ruling on the record here. This is from
04:02 Justice Clements, who issued the ruling, let me quote here. “Brazau’s
04:06 TONE OF VOICE and CONTENT OF HIS SPEECH as captured
04:10 on his own audio recordings suggested he was very angry and had little interest
04:14 in discussion or debate.” Chris, I didn’t know it was against the law
04:18 to be very angry about things. And I didn’t know that you had to have an interest in debate
04:22 before you spoke. I didn’t know that was the law. (CS) Yeah, well, according to this judge
04:26 it is, again, it’s a very subjective section of the criminal code. (EL) That could apply to anyone!
04:30 What protester isn’t angry? If you’re not angry, you’re probably not protesting.
04:35 (CS) The unfortunate reality is that the knife doesn’t seem to cut both ways. (EL) Well, isn’t that the truth? Here…
04:39 Let me read another excerpt from the ruling here. Next one.
04:43 ”Clearly in that context he was not interested in nor did he intend to have
04:47 a discussion or debate on the ideas expressed in that document
04:51 I find he knew the material he was distributing would deeply wound
04:55 and anger Muslims.” I love how he uses the word ‘wound’. I know what a wound is;
04:59 if you have a wound you have to go to the doctor and get (treatment).
05:03 I didn’t know feelings, I didn’t know you could call a hurt feeling — I have no doubt he hurt some feelings…
05:07 just like people hurt my feelings, and everyone’s feelings can be hurt.
05:11 I didn’t know that wounding a feeling could put you in jail for nine months. If he just sexually assaulted
05:15 someone he would have been out in two months. (CS) Yeah, this is what we’re dealing with, Ezra,
05:19 you’ve been experiencing it, and this particular individual experienced the same —
05:23 these groups in society that use this sort of dark
05:27 politics or identity politics in order to quash out
05:31 language and speech they don’t want, and frankly they don’t want other people to hear.
05:35 I would much rather, like you and me Ezra, debate these ideas in a free society and let
05:39 the better ideas rise to the top and the weaker ones fall.
05:43 (EL) Yeah, you know, it’s funny — in a way, this judge is guilty of doing what he claimed Brazau did. This judge isn’t interested in debate…
05:47 this judge isn’t interested in discussion. This judge wants to put
05:51 people he disagrees with in jail! (CS) So what we need to do, Ezra, is —
05:55 I sort of have my hit-list of reforms that need, you need legislatures in this country,
05:59 federal and provincial, to get rid of these laws which restrict freedom, and if they’re not prepared to go that far,
06:03 then at least provide some interpretation, guidance to the
06:07 judges on how they apply this very subjective section of the criminal code,
06:11 and lastly, get rid of blasphemy laws in this country.
06:15 (EL) That’s what this is. This is a ‘fatwa’ against this guy for daring to criticize
06:19 the sharia Koran. Nice to see you on the show, Chris.
 story source

Black Africans are Genetically Closer to Bonobos Than to White Humans

Andrew AnglinDaily Stormer
April 11, 2014
Here you have a graph, provided by the journal Nature, which is self explanatory.
lol.
lol.
You can read the entire peer-reviewed article, entitled “The bonobo genome compared with the chimpanzee and human genomes,” here at Nature.
Genetic science is creating a crisis for the cultural Marxists who wish us to believe that “race doesn’t exist.”  The lie simply cannot be sustained.
What they appear to be doing, is reporting all of this new information in their journals, of course without value-judgement (it’s hard science), and then failing to report it in the popular science outlets, thus the people are unaware of it.
But that obviously can’t go on forever.  Eventually, someone is going to have to explain why we are being coerced into treating beings that are closer to apes than they are to us as if they are equal contributors to society.
Bonobo
Bonobo
Central_African_Republic_-_Boy_in_Birao
African
European
European

Sunday, 13 April 2014

Feminist try to push white male tax (video)

Young Germans ignorant of Roma Holocaust persecution

32% of Germans between 24 and 35 years old ignore that Roma people were Holocaust victims. 19% have never heard about Nazi persecutions against gypsies, a percentage that anyway decreases to 9% for over 65. This is what emerges from a survey carried out at the Federal Antidiscrimination Centre that has presented the first results of its study (to be published in July) on the feelings about of Roma and Sinti in Germany. That, however, are not only characterized by the fact of ignoring this part of History. For living in peace with minorities, 91% of the sample put in the first place the necessity of improving integration services. While for 83% the most important thing is to facilitate their entrance in the labour market. Essential for others the aspect of “welfare tourism”, to the point that 80% of interviewees the fight against those profiting from social benefits is the priority. Finally, for 34% of Germans, a simpler solution: more Polizei controls. 

Saturday, 12 April 2014

Read & Vomit! National Geographic Concludes What Americans Will Look Like in 2050, and It's Beautiful .hahaha

It's no secret that interracial relationships are trending upward, and in a matter of years we'll have Tindered, OKCupid-ed and otherwise sexed ourselves into one giant amalgamated mega-race.
But what will we look like? National Geographic built its 125th anniversary issue around this very question last October, commissioning Martin Schoeller, a renowned photographer and portrait artist, to capture the lovely faces of our nation's multiracial future.
Here's how the "average American" will look by the year 2050:
Image Credit: National Geographic
And like this:

Image Credit: National Geographic
And this:

Image Credit: National Geographic
Wow. These are obviously not Photoshopped projections, but real people, meaning tomorrow's America lives among us now in every "Blackanese," "Filatino," "Chicanese" and "Korgentinian" you meet at the DMV, grocery store or wherever it is you hang out.
Their numbers will only grow. The U.S. Census Bureau let respondents check more than one race for the first time in 2000, and 6.8 million people did so. By 2010 that figure had increased to nearly 9 million, a spike of about 32%.
This is certainly encouraging, but there are obvious flaws with tracking racial population growth through a survey that lets people self-identify, especially since so many familial, cultural and even geographical factors influence your decision to claim one or multiple races. Complicating things further is the definition of race itself: It has no basis in biology, yet its constructions, functions and mythologies irrevocably shape the world as we know it.
So is an end approaching? Will increased racial mixing finally and permanently redefine how we imagine our racial identities? The latest figures suggest we're getting more comfortable with the idea, or perhaps that we simply give fewer shits than ever before. Either would be a step in the right direction.
The Wall Street Journal reported a few years back that 15% of new marriages in 2010 were between individuals of different races. It's unclear whether they've included same-sex unions in the count, but as currently stated, this number is more than double what it was 25 years ago. The proportion of intermarriages also varied by race, with "9% of whites, 17% of blacks, 26% of Hispanics and 28% of Asians [marrying] outside their ethnic or racial group." Interracial unions now account for 8.4% of all marriages in the U.S.

Image Credit: Wall Street Journal
In addition, more than 7% of the 3.5 million children born in 2009, the year before the 2010 census, were of two or more races.
The future: As for how this looks moving forward, studies have repeatedly shown that young people, especially those under 30, are significantly more amenable to interracial relationships than older adults, while college grads are more likely to have positive attitudes toward them than those with only a high school diploma. What does this mean for Millennials? As a population composed largely of over-educated 20-somethings, our generation is primed and expected to play a major role in populating this projected future America. That goes double if you live in a Western state, where people intermarry at higher rates; Hawaii is winning at the moment, with 4 of 10 new marriages identifying as interracial.
This doesn't mean it's all sunshine, rainbows and butterflies, however. Stark segregation still plagues many parts of the country. Poverty remains a barrier to social mobility and its consequent opportunities to interact with a diverse range of people. Sadly, the inequalities that shape American society as a whole are equally present in interracial relationship patterns. Time will tell if this holds for the long term.
But in the meantime, let us applaud these growing rates of intermixing for what they are: An encouraging symbol of a rapidly changing America. 2050 remains decades away, but if these images are any preview, it's definitely a year worth waiting for.

French City with 40% Muslim Population is the Most Dangerous City in Europe

Marseille
The French city of Marseille has an estimated 30 to 40 percent Muslim population and has been ranked as the most dangerous city in Europe.
 The gritty Mediterranean port, France’s second-largest city, was appointed the “cultural capital of Europe,” a rotating European Union honor. City fathers launched beautification projects, created new tourism attractions and invited people from around the world to visit. A splendid stone esplanade was laid around the Old Port, peppered with novel sculpture, and a high-tech historical museum went up next to City Hall.
How did that work out?
The eruption has refocused attention on Marseille’s long-standing reputation as a European drug-smuggling hub, a place where entire neighborhoods have slipped away from police control and fallen under the command of gangsters who earn millions importing and selling North African hashish and settle turf disputes with AK-47 assault rifles.
“Marseille is sick with its violence,” Interior Minister Manuel Valls said.
Vowing to squash the drug trade and end the violence, Valls last week dispatched 250 paramilitary and other national police officers to reinforce the usual deployment of around 3,000. The night after they were deployed, with television cameras in tow, another body was found, burned to a crisp with a bullet in its charred skull, the execution method local traffickers call the “barbecue.” The next day, two Turkish immigrants were shot and wounded, and a pair of youths driving by on a motor scooter opened fire with a pistol on a third man, wounding him in the legs.
Marseille doesn’t have a violence problem. It has a Muslim immigrant problem.
In September 2011, at between 4 and 5 am, around 15 people “apparently in a state of drunkenness” broke into the barracks belonging to a military fire service, shouted at the firemen on duty there then began firing shots at them. 7 firemen were wounded, of whom 4 were taken to hospital. The party of “jeunes” had apparently come from a bus chartered by a group of Cape Verdians in Nice to travel to an “Africa night” in Marseilles.
A week later, a bus driver was attacked by passengers when he refused to allow two burka-clad women to travel on his bus. It is illegal in France to wear the burka in public. When one of the women tried to board the bus, displaying a bus pass bearing a photograph, the driver insisted that she unveil so he could verify her identity. She refused to do this and, after some discussion, decided to leave and wait for the next bus.
Angry passengers (“jeunes”) then took the side of the women and beat up the driver, accusing him of being a “racist”. They then invited the burka-wearing woman to re-enter the bus. But when the police arrived, they scattered. Police booked the woman for wearing a burka.
In reacting to the incident, the president of the Marseilles Transport Authority, which operated the bus, appeared to sympathise with the woman rather than, as might have been expected, his own driver. The driver’s reaction was “inappropriate”, he said. The explanation comes with this “president’s” name: Karim ZĂ©ribi.
Muslims have now set up unofficial checkpoints in various parts of Marseilles. Anyone entering “their” area has to stop and submit to inspection. Last week, the driver of a van belonging to a food bank, which distributes free food and drink to poor people, was stopped by a group of “jeunes” when trying to enter the Marseilles district of “Air-Bel”. The road had been barred with concrete blocks and bins filled with sand. They searched his vehicle “like policemen applying the law in their territory” in order to “check there weren’t any policemen inside”. When they saw he only had milk, they let him pass through.
This is what a real No Go Zone looks like. As I wrote last year, Marseilles is on track to becoming France’s first majority Muslim city.
Muslims had attacked the port city in the 9th century capturing it and enslaving its native inhabitants. That which Muslims once took, their theologians insist is theirs in perpetuity. The Muslim return to Marseille is seen as a reconquista, a return to the land that was once theirs.
Nearly half of all immigrants to France are Muslim. In Marseille 41.8 percent of those under 18 were of foreign descent.
La Marseillaise, France’s National Anthem, got its name when volunteer revolutionaries from Marseille sang the song. Now Marseille is at the center of a new revolution. The Islamic Revolution. Muslim volunteers from France have been identified training with the Taliban and after Mohammed Merah’s massacre at a Jewish school, a group of Jews in Marseille were attacked by Muslim men shouting, “Vive Mohamed Merah, F— the Jews, Palestine will win.”
This is what happens when the cultural capital of Europe meets Muslim immigration.

source frontpagemag.

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More