14 Words by Email

JEWISH Media BE DAMNED! -- Shocking Proof that Whites -- NOT BLACKS -- are far more likey to Be Shot by Police!

The above is a chart right out of 2011 annual firearms discharge report by the largest police department in America showing that although Whites are only about 5 percent of criminals and only about 3 percent of identified criminal shooters of firearms, they constitute 44 percent of those shot to death by the police in NY city, while blacks who are over 70 percent of violent criminals are only 22 percent of those shot to death by police. .

Denmark: Far-Right Ethno-Nationalist Party in FIRST PLACE!

For the first time ever, the far-right Danish People's Party (DF) has come out of an opinion poll as the nation's largest party.

Alois Brunner, the world's most wanted Nazi died in Syria

Over the weekend, the death of Alois Brunner, the world's most wanted Nazi, was all but confirmed by the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Brunner, who was the top aide to "Final Solution" architect Adolf Eichmann, is thought to have died four years ago in Syria, where he lived for decades after sending nearly 130,000 Jews to Nazi death camps during World War II.

Wotan

“In Germany shall divers sects arise, Coming very near to happy paganism. The heart captivated and small receivings Shall open the gate to pay the true tithe.”

Man against time

How do I soothe this lions heart? How do I quench my rage? I'm a man out of time in a valorless world, I'm a tiger in a cage! The gray men with their lunch pails, live out life as a working drone, they toil and sweat and in the end they get, old age and the nursing home!

Wednesday, 22 April 2015

Diversity Training

Commissar Elliott's Experiment
On the day after Martin Luther King Jr. was murdered in April 1968, Jane Elliott's third graders from the small, all-white town of Riceville, Iowa, came to class confused and upset. They recently had made King their "Hero of the Month," and they couldn't understand why someone would kill him. So Elliott decided to teach her class a daring lesson in the meaning of discrimination. She wanted to show her pupils what discrimination feels like, and what it can do to people.
Elliott divided her class by eye color -- those with blue eyes and those with brown. On the first day, the brown-eyed children were told they were smarter, nicer, neater, and better than those with blue eyes. Throughout the day, Elliot praised them and allowed them privileges such as a taking a longer recess and being first in the lunch line. In contrast, the blue-eyed children had to wear collars around their necks and their behavior and performance were criticized and ridiculed by Elliott. On the second day, the roles were reversed and the brown-eyed children were made to feel inferior while the blue eyes were designated the dominant group.
Excerpted from http://www.pbs.org/
Jane Elliott's influential training exercise was essentially a form of child abuse put into practice for well over a decade in a small school in rural Iowa. It presupposed that the racial differences that distinguish Blacks from Whites are entirely inconsequential, simply a matter of superficial differences in appearance. She selected eye color as an inconsequential physical feature that illustrated the supposed errors of White "racism" and the suffering of its victims. Just as Whites had historically inflicted terrible suffering on Blacks based merely on the color of their skin, Elliott's White students would experience analogous suffering based merely on the color of their eyes.
Elliott initially stigmatized the blue-eyed White children in her third-grade class as criminally inferior and subjected them to abuse by the brown-eyed White children. Then, in the second stage of her exercise, she reversed the hierarchy, with blue-eyed Whites becoming the preferred group, encouraged to abuse brown-eyed Whites just as they had been abused in the first stage. In other words, both groups of Euro-American children were compelled to become the victims of Elliott's manufactured "racism."
Jane Elliott, a multiracialist O'BrienWe should emphasize that this dose of educational sadism was administered to young kids in the third grade. Jane Elliott's grand idea was that the White children in her class should be forced to become both racial tormentors and racial victims, and that they should learn how the suffering they experienced as victims had been based on an insignificant physical feature, eye color, over which they had no control. They would experience a small, concentrated sample of what Elliott believed was the near-genocidal oppression that Euro-Americans had imposed on Blacks. The White children were, as far as Elliott was concerned, getting off lightly: They deserved far more punishment for their inherited racial sins than she could possibly inflict. [Image: Jane Elliott.]
For this bizarre educational exercise, tormenting powerless children to combat their racial prejudices, Elliott became famous, and in the years that followed she expanded her anti-racialist career, becoming a leading diversity trainer and the subject of a fawning PBS documentary honoring her accomplishments in the holy war against White "racism." Her more recent diversity-education seminars, also celebrated in a television documentary, are just as racially demeaning as the cruel exploit that first won her fame in the 1960s.
Elliott's experiment, like most exercises in diversity training, was nothing less than pedagogical Maoism. Diversity education begins with the belief that Whites as a group are disfigured by a severe racial pathology, which has caused untold suffering to countless numbers of innocent persons of color. Whites acquire this pathology from their parents and from the surrounding Eurocentric society, but by strenuous efforts in reeducation they can be at least partially liberated from it. The psychological and physical welfare of racial minorities demands that this therapeutic liberation occur.
If you're White, there is something profoundly and dangerously wrong with you, even if (like a third-grade kid in an all-White community) you've never been in any position to mistreat minorities. You can hurt Blacks even if you've never met a Black, which was the case for all of Elliott's initial child subjects. That's because the racial assumptions that you have learned from your parents and from the cultural environment that your White forefathers created themselves constitute an insidious assault on racial minorities, spawning a pervasive and destructive "racism" that must be ameliorated, though it can never be entirely eradicated, by repeated immersion in programs of racial reeducation. Diversity trainers are not, by the way, afraid of this word "reeducation," despite its blood-stained history in the reeducational campaigns of Marxist killers from Stalin to Pol Pot.
Most National Vanguard readers will, of course, have detected the massive fallacy inherent in Elliott's experiment. It is clearly untrue that the racial differences between Blacks and Whites are as inconsequential as the difference between blue and brown eyes. Blacks are, for example, statistically more violent than Whites and score lower in measured intelligence, and those non-debatable facts would remain true even if, as Elliott and her ilk wrongly believe, race is an artificial social construction rather than a hard genetic reality.
There is, however, a small but significant truth in the common leftist claim that race is a social construction, a truth from which any non-racialist Whites who have dropped by this site can learn an important lesson.
Elliott, to her credit, is principled in her evil. In her current diversity seminars no White -- man or woman, liberal or conservative, fire fighter or bank president, recent European immigrant or old-stock Anglo-Saxon -- escapes racial vilification. Elliott attacks Whites as Whites. All of us have been infected with what she calls the "live virus of racism." Even if you are a naively raceless White, for the growing diversity industry you remain a mentally diseased enemy whose thoughts and unconscious attitudes must be unlearned or restructured. In that respect your racial identity as a Euro-American is indeed a construction produced by the political and quasi-therapeutic forces arrayed against you, forces that will undoubtedly gain greater strength as non-White demographics expand. You may be an inveterate celebrator of diversity and a supporter of open-borders immigration and compensatory discrimination, but you are still criminally White in the eyes of diversity trainers. Like affirmative action, diversity training objectively defines you as White regardless of your own subjective self-identification. You become, to borrow a term from multiculturalism's academic jargon, a member of a "racialized population," assigned to a fixed racial category whether you like it or not.
The lesson: White nationalism is rational self-defense. If you are attacked as a member of a group, then you must defend your group in order to defend yourself.

The awakening of nationalism in Belarus






Pride in one’s own native language and culture is the bedrock of nationalism. Nationalism in Belarus has been slow to awaken because their language and culture have been subsumed under the oppressive dominance of the Russian language and Russian culture.

The Belarusian language has been suppressed for a very long time. Belarus became part of Russia in 1795. From that date, the language was discouraged. In 1839, it was prohibited to preach in Belarusian. In 1864, students were banned from speaking their mother tongue at school. In 1867, the printing of books in Belarusian was prohibited. In recent decades, the country has loosened the restrictions on the Belarusian language, but not much. Today, Belarusian books are allowed to be published, but they only make up about 9.5% of the market.

Despite this repression, over the years, the native people of Belarus have held their language dear to their hearts and steadfastly refuse to let it become extinct.

A former Soviet Republic, the country declared independence in 1991 after the fall of the Soviet Union. Since 1994, Alexander Lukashenko has held the presidency and has ruled more or less like an authoritarian dictator. Opposition parties have arisen over the years, but they have been suppressed.

Until now, there hasn’t been any opportunity for nationalism to grow in Belarus. The 2010 presidential election is a glaring example of how things have been in the country. Lukashenko received 80% of the vote with the runner up opposition leader, Andrei Sannikov receiving just 3%. Opposition leaders and their supporters claimed that the elections were fraudulent and were no doubt correct. Angered by the result, they took to the streets of Minsk to protest. Many of the protesters and the rival presidential candidates were beaten and arrested by the state militia. Sannikov himself was sentenced to prison and house arrest for over four years. Other protests were arranged via social media some time after that.

Lukashenko is partly to blame for the continued suppression of the Belarusian language. He once stated that “nothing significant can be expressed in Belarusian.” Mr. Lukashenko’s sentiments are patently untrue. Belarus is a Slavic language in the Indo-European language family. It has as much validity, meaningfulness, and usefulness as Russian, Ukranian, or any other Slavic language.

Russian and Belarusian are both official languages of Belarus, but the Russian language has always been the accepted language in popular culture, schools, business arrangements, the media and press, and in government. Despite Belarus declaring independence, they have relied on Russia for business and trade and this has also contributed to the ongoing dominance of Russian culture. Only 23% of the 9.67 million inhabitants speak Belarusian. No more than 10% claim to speak it in their daily lives.

But change is in the air.

There is a spirit of revival for Belarusian culture as language classes in Belarusian are emerging in the country. One of the most popular classes in Minsk is at a cafe known as “Gallery Y”.


A Belarusian language class at Gallery Y:




An active promoter in the Belarusian awakening has been the national campaign “Budzma” which organises cultural events across Belarus and also a festival of advertising in Belarusian called Ad.nak!.

A coordinator of the Ad.nak campaign, Alena Makouskaya states:

“Five years ago, when we started Ad.nak!, we were anxious there wouldn’t be any second edition. Since then the amount of entries tripled. People long for their national identity, to be different, to be proud of who they are. Political is daily, cultural is eternal.”

Businesses are starting to translate their documents from Russian to Belarusian. The private network of gas stations known as A-100 has translated all of their documents to Belarusian and require all staff to speak Belarusian.

An alternative flag is being flown everywhere. To the people of Belarus, their true flag is the White-Red-White flag, not the flag promoted by the Lukashenko government.


The current flag of Belarus:




The picture below shows the flags and symbols from previous occupations. The first column is the Russian-inspired flag and symbol. Next is the flag and symbol for the independence-Lukashenko period. The third is the new flag and symbol that the people want:




The new flag is seen everywhere.

In the streets:




On towers:




At sporting events:




In ads:




In the clothes people wear at celebrations:




The Belarusian spirit awakening:




There is also a revival of Belarusian folk culture. Every March, the people celebrate the vernal equinox spring festival known as Kamaeditsa or Gukanne Vyasny (Calling of Spring). The festival includes ritual spring songs, dances, and games. In addition to this festival, neo-pagan rites are also being celebrated to honor their pre-Christian heritage.


The Calling of Spring Festival:













The neo-pagan summer solstice celebration. The man carries a wheel which represents the sun:




Belarus racial demographics:

98+ % White
83.7% Belarusians
8.3% Russians
3.1% Poles
1.7% Ukranians
Other White nationalities

Non-whites
Muslims - 0.5%
Jews - 0.1 - 0.5%
Other miscellaneous non-whites - 0.2%

As you can see from the demographics listed above, it isn’t the threat of non-white immigration that is awakening nationalistic sentiments in the hearts of the people. It is the fact that their native culture has been suppressed for over 220 years.

The people of Belarus are hungry for their own culture, their own identity.

We can all be discouraged from time to time when we think of the daily threats on White societies, but if you look at the positive developments occurring all around you, you can find inspiration in the incredible awakening occurring right now before our very eyes.

US: Whites Fleeing to the Countryside

by Jeff Davis

Here’s another one of those fascinating little articles that demonstrates White people doing things for racial reasons, but wherein the word “race” is not mentioned once.

An article from Pewtrusts reports: “Winding up Route 400, a good 40 minutes’ north of Atlanta’s traffic-snarled freeways, are miles of farmhouses, interspersed with mobile homes, McMansions and thrift shops. Here, too, is Dawson County’s biggest draw: the North Georgia Premium Outlets, where tourists hunt for bargains at Burberry, Armani and Restoration Hardware.”



“Despite the designer outlets, the vibe is decidedly rural Americana.” (Interesting code word for “White.”) “Tractors chug the roads. Masonic symbols emblazon the county government building. It’s a small town feel that Ginny Tarver says drew her to the area from Naples, Florida, to get married and work as an executive assistant in the county building. “

That and to get away from the Blacks, Haitians and racial Babylon of southern Florida.

“Dawson is one of the fastest growing counties in Georgia and reflects a demographic shift in the nation: a return to exurbia.” (That’s the yuppie word for country now, I guess.) “New census data show that for the first time since 2010, the outermost suburban counties are growing faster than urban counties and close-in suburbs, according to analysis by the Brookings Institution. People are moving back to the exurbs, some for jobs, others for bigger and more affordable homes in a more wide-open space.”

“…A decade ago, the exurbs were the hot thing in real estate. Between 2005 and 2006, the peak growth period for exurbs, urban counties lost over 1.3 million people as people left for the far reaches in surrounding counties.”

“Young professionals in search of more affordable housing gravitated there, lured by sprawling subdivisions. Exurbs gained about 146,000 new residents through domestic migration, according to William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, who analyzed the new Census Bureau population estimates for counties and metro areas, which were released on March 26.”

I would imagine this coincided with the availability of high-speed internet service in these areas, thus making telecommuting possible. Most big corporations have been dragging their heels refusing to allow employees to telecommute, but the few who do get the chance, flee the big cities with their sky-high real estate prices and minority crime and ruined public schools.

This is a great opportunity for any Whites, who can swing it. You get big city pay and the low real estate prices of a rural area. I hope a good number of Whites do take advantage of this, and tell their friends just how wonderful it is to live in an all-White community –something which White people in big cities have long forgotten.

Hopefully, the Whites, who choose to live in the exurbs, will pay off their home loans ASAP and save up some money for future hard times because there are other problems facing America –like jobs being outsourced to India and a total financial collapse thanks in part to a dim witted mulatto, who has been running up the National Debt. At least the White people in the exurbs will be spared some of the worst chaos which will break out in the big cities.

Enough with WWII apologies: Japan PM sees no need to reinforce remorse

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe has implied Tokyo is not going to reiterate an apology for WWII aggression and war crimes in a special statement marking the 70th anniversary of the end of the war in the Pacific to be issued later this year.
Speaking to Fuji TV on Monday night, Abe mentioned there will be no more apologies to the victims of Japanese aggression during the WWII, as apologies made in the past have already made the point.
On 50th and 60th anniversaries of Japan’s defeat in August 1945, Abe’s predecessors issued apologies for conduct during the WWII.
“I uphold the basic thinking behind past war apologies, which means there isn’t a need to reiterate them,” Japanese PM said in an interview, describing nation’s self-reflection over war-time atrocities as “masochism.”

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (C) is led by a Shinto priest as he visits Yasukuni shrine in Tokyo December 26, 2013. (Reuters / Toru Hanai)
Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe (C) is led by a Shinto priest as he visits Yasukuni shrine in Tokyo December 26, 2013. (Reuters / Toru Hanai)
Abe also speculated as to whether “invasion” is the correct term to describe Japan’s occupation of the Korean Peninsula and parts of continental China.
It is highly possible that Abe’s latest remarks are going to confirm suspicions by Japan’s neighbors that Tokyo is seeking to downplay its wartime deeds, among which was turning thousands of Asian women into ‘comfort women’, de facto sex slaves in Japanese military brothels.
Abe’s visit to Yasukuni war shrine in Tokyo in December 2013 sparked fierce protests from China and South Korea, the countries Japan occupied until the defeat in 1945. Resentment of Japan’s neighbors is understandable: among the 2.4 million war dead honored at Yasukuni are internationally-recognized war criminals who committed atrocities on the occupied territories.
This year PM Abe has opted to refrain from visiting Yasukuni. Instead of personally attending shrine’s spring festival this week he sent to Yasukuni a symbolic offering.
Abe’s self-restraint could be explained by participation in the upcoming Asia-Africa conference in Jakarta on Wednesday, where he is expected to hold talks with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and South Korean PM Park Geun-hye.
After over half a century of exemplary peaceful policies, Abe’s conservative government is moving away from the pacifist stance fixed in Japan’s post-WWII constitution.
In 2014, Abe’s cabinet reversed a post-war constitutional ban on military operations abroad. The law enacted in 1954 has considerably limited soldiers’ scope abroad, as the lessons of 1930s-1940s are still fresh in the memory, when the country was dragged into conflict with China and the Pacific War that followed.
In January this year, Japan’s government approved nation’s largest military budget in 70 years, in contravention of the pacifist constitution. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's cabinet gave the green light to an unprecedented nearly 5 trillion yen ($42 billion) defense budget, which came into force in April.

Sunday, 19 April 2015

This is the true state of our country right now.


Friday, 17 April 2015

Asian man screams "Stop White Genocide"! (video)

Italians revolt against African invasion

Italians are resisting the huge influx of immigrants arriving on their shores, with some politicians calling on supporters to say "no, with every means, to every new arrival"

Italians are in growing revolt against the number of migrants arriving on their shores, with more than 10,000 people rescued from the Mediterranean in the past week alone.
The huge influx of asylum seekers from the Middle East and Africa is putting an intolerable strain on a country that has been in recession for the past five years.
Conservative politicians called this week for boatloads of refugees to be sent back to Libya, while the system of migrant reception centres is on the verge of collapse.
The government in Rome has asked regional authorities to provide 6,500 new beds for migrants who are arriving on a daily basis in Sicily and the tiny island of Lampedusa.
But many regions responded grudgingly - some with downright hostility - saying they had no space to offer.
Val d’Aosta, a small, mountainous region on the French border, offered to take just one refugee.
There was also a frosty reception from the wealthy northern region of Lombardy.
“Here, as in Veneto (a neighbouring region that includes Venice) there is zero space,” said Roberto Maroni, the governor of Lombardy and a member of the staunchly anti-immigration Northern League. "We cannot be subjected to this invasion.”
“We are totally opposed to taking any more migrants,” said Luca Zaia, the governor of Veneto and also a member of the Northern League.
Conservative politicians say the policy of rescuing migrants at sea only encourages people trafficking by Libyan gangs.

Georgia Meloni of the Forza Italia party says migrants should be stopped before they set sail for Italy (MARKA/Alamy)
Giorgia Meloni, the head of Silvio Berlusconi’s centre-Right Forza Italia party, said boats departing from Libya "should be stopped as they leave," while boats with smugglers on board "should be sunk".
Nearly 70,000 migrants and asylum seekers are currently being cared for by the Italian authorities and there have been warnings that as many as 500,000 refugees could try to cross to Italy this year.
While there is sympathy for the plight of people fleeing war, persecution and poverty, Italians say they cannot be expected to shoulder the burden without help from Europe.
“The system is close to collapse,” said Claudio Palomba, the prefect of Rimini, on the Adriatic coast, and the president of the national union of prefects. “We’re only in April and I don’t know if the system will be able to cope if the number of arrivals keeps up at this pace.”
Matteo Salvini, the head of the Northern League and a rising star of the Italian Right, has called on his supporters to block moves to accommodate any more migrants.
"I ask the League's governors, mayors, assessors and councillors to say no, with every means, to every new arrival. The League is ready to occupy every hotel, hostel, school or barracks intended for the alleged refugees," he wrote on his Facebook account this week.
As boatloads of refugees continue to make the dangerous crossing from Libya, merchant vessels in the Mediterranean complained that they were being called to help with rescues.
Italy terminated its search and rescue operation, Mare Nostrum, in October and it has been replaced by a much smaller operation run by Frontex, the EU’s border control agency, which has to rely on the assistance of merchant ships.
Last year, merchant ships rescued 44,000 migrants, out of total of 170,000 who reached Italy from North Africa.
One Italian tug boat, the Asso 21, which normally supplies oil rigs in the Mediterranean, claims to have assisted in 60 rescues last year and 22 so far this year.
“The situation is becoming unsustainable,” Mario Mattioli, the owner of the tug boat, told La Repubblica on Thursday. “Taking part in rescues is no longer unusual – it has become routine.
“Like other merchant ships we are being called on to help out on a daily basis, but our crews are not trained to deal with these operations. We can’t provide medical care or thermal blankets or emergency food.”
There are also security issues for the crews of merchant ships – this week traffickers fired shots into the air from Kalashnikovs in order to force an Italian vessel and an Icelandic coast guard ship to relinquish a wooden boat which had been used to transport migrants from the Libyan coast.

Source telegraph 

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More